The morning meal

 The morning meal, the child silent students to Send PM to discuss with me, finished, and went to fiddle with the blog, I went to see a great article called She also so dedicated to work, since when I returned the favor to be regarded as a National Day gift.
Bowen saw her, I would think that the differences with her not only my assessment of the film to be more than she a little higher, but the winds have not blown it means. the artistic taste of the debate, I gradually formed a two principles: First, do not do pure lyrical controversy, such as ; like the position, so that argument does not help further, nor to consensus. Second, the quality is not to rank each other's artistic taste, the view is inspired by Louis I, he said, not because someone else is not reading Classic, not the books to look down on others arbitrarily. It is important that you do not read books or movies are good, but that you can tell how many of these interesting things, to enrich himself, to others to inspire.
The so-called, we have no quarrel too much unnecessary and after several discussions with a lot of things down the back surface, and sometimes confrontation right is still good.
the so-called concept of the problem first. I do not appreciate the idea that children are too silent straightforward, too obvious intention of the works, as she recently read Salman Rushdie's We are well received on the teachings of Marx, but also by the Marxist bully. Marne correspondence about this issue, when their target is the Schiller, and like some ridicule as The Mao Zedong's Yan'an speech, but it is a big plus for propaganda art encouraged. Most do not experience the history and telling the people a feel for the history, concept art will be on the alert and exclusion. At this point, I and sub-Mo The starting point is the same.
but the problem seems to be not so simple. The so-called criticism of a work Said in Jane. Austen read out the imperialist ideology, you say this is the idea that Austin Said his own ideas? easy to see why some novel ideas first, why have some to not so easy? In addition, you can also ask, Ostrovsky). we accept the Marxist criticism of Schiller's point of view, but did not go to a good read Schiller's play? He works really that bad? in the absence of the necessary premise of the reading experience, to take However, to accept this view, is indeed a said, give up the truth and justice, but she actually cares about most is justice, not to mention, the truth itself has ethical value. Therefore, the claim that created fig leaf of confusion. In such circumstances, the small building the concept of the students came out to re-dishing the banner of literature, not without reason. this time with another piece of . This problem can not be avoided.
addition, the understand the problems of imperialism, I would prefer to understand it as human beings, otherwise the alien does not have the reference of appearance. Although everywhere is talking about the only an ideal rather than reality, so I defend universal values, not its reality, but in its idealism. If there is no support for this belief, I think sooner or later will destroy mankind. and love, is a way of ending the disaster. by the individual, the family gave birth out of love, from the brilliant civilization that once built. and grew to love the view, but also to the common Western philosophers respected, regardless of and the old man The higher the ride is always difficult. the issue involves the limits of human nature, have some ultimate meaning, has nothing to do with China, with the post-colonial, women have little problem.
this theory can not solve the problem. artists only through their own work inspired by the little people to think of love and love, where the hero makes sympathy, we feel the same desire to go home by, but he let me feel a little disgust, his love of family why can not push and to the alien, and to push those people further away? aliens equally impressive affectionate father, a small alien smart, cute, especially like me. Finally alien spacecraft sitting home, leaving people can not help laughing down the sentence of age for the universe, a symbol of love. I think it is more like an elegy of mankind, from God's perspective, human love is still limited. the final act implicitly asking: How People armed with roses, out of self-centered .
for such problems, the small building and his colleagues have been out Imagine there. previous more, related to the ultimate issue, although it can also be reduced to topics to interpret reality. You and I, after all, you and our communication is possible, but if you want your sympathy I arrived at the depth of love, I am afraid always only human the dream. Although I do not think this is a science fiction film, but it ultimately raised the issue of a science fiction piece.